Danny Salas

Archive for the 'Loan Qualification' Category

VA…The BEST Loan In The Industry! “Generally” Speaking

Ranked A Four-Star Loan By Access Real Estate Lending

The General Loan...VA

VA:  The “General” Loan

Where else can you obtain 100% financing without mortgage insurance…with ONE loan?  Well, USDA, loans, but…OTHER THAN THAT?  NOWHERE!  That’s right…VA Loans enable a veteran to obtain 100% financing, have the seller pay most bank fees, and also have the seller credit 4% of the sales price toward other closing costs and prepaid items like taxes and homeowner’s insurance.   In most cases, the VA buyer can move into the home with almost nothing down.  AND NOT HAVE A PAYMENT FOR UP TO ALMOST TWO MONTHS!  You just cannot do any better than VA Loans…they’re the best.  So, in a previous article, I may have mentioned that FHA is King; VA must be “The General Loan.”  I like that…”VA…The General Loan.”  Coin that!

Getting In With No Money

Let’s give an example…VA allows a veteran to put nothing down…0%!  So, automatically, we’re at 100% financing.  Then, over and above that, they allow a seller to credit up to 4% of the sales price, towards a buyer’s closing costs and impound account.  Even more desirable, the veteran is NOT allowed to pay many fees that most borrowers do have to pay.

The Critical Offer

When writing an offer, make sure you understand that the buyer is NOT allowed to pay certain fees.  Really, the only fees a veteran may pay is an origination fee, reasonable discount fees (to buy the rate down), credit report, flood certificate, appraisal, and title fees.  Any other “bank fees,” must be paid for by the seller.  So, if your lender has a tax service fee, a processing fee, an administration fee, an underwriting fee, or any other “bank fee,” prepare to have the seller pay for these fees.

Title And Escrow Fees Can Be Sticky

Also, keep in mind that there are VA guidelines regarding title and escrow:  Escrow must be paid for, by the seller.  Also, depending on how the contract is written, you may be able to have the seller pay all title fees, as well.  What I mean by that is VA’s guidelines state that title is to be paid according to “what is typical for the area.”  So, in Butte County, we generally structure the buyer and seller paying 50% of the CLTA Title Policy.  We generally structure that the buyer will pay the ALTA Title Insurance Policy.  However, if you write the contract to state that seller is to pay CLTA and ALTA Title insurance policies, than you free up more of the 4% seller credit funds that can go toward the buyer’s impound account and other costs.  Most VA underwriters don’t happen to live in the actual county that the contract is being written.  Therefore, what is typical for the area, is generally passed along as to what is written in the contract.

VA Rank

So, VA is a four-star loan.  The General Loan.  Feel free to call me when writing a VA contract.  We can go over the particulars, together.

Related Must Reads

Read About FHA

What To Subscribe To:

Get Our Twitter Updates
Get Our Blog Blast
Connect With Us On Facebook

$8,000 Tax Credit…Alive Into 2010?

Tax Credit Getting An Extension?

$15,000 Tax Credit...or $8,000

Nation’s Housing

Legislation introduced to keep tax credit alive

San Diego Union Tribune
 
By Kenneth R. Harney
2:00 a.m. September 27, 2009

WASHINGTON — Will Congress extend the wildly popular $8,000 home-buyer tax credit beyond its Dec. 1 expiration date?

That’s a question generating huge pressure on Capitol Hill, from would-be buyers who haven’t found the right house to realty agents, builders, lenders and squads of lobbyists working on their behalf.

But here’s the first hint of an answer: On Sept. 17, the leadership of Congress’ primary tax legislative committee introduced a tax credit bill that’s likely to zip through the House and move to the Senate rapidly. Charles Rangel, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, sponsored the bipartisan Service Members Homeownership Tax Act (H.R. 3590), which would extend the credit for another 12 months for thousands of military, Foreign Service and intelligence agency personnel who’ve been posted abroad during 2009.

Rangel’s bill, with 29 co-sponsors, would keep the credit alive through Nov. 30, 2010, for service members who had at least 90 days of overseas duty assignments during 2009 and who otherwise meet the eligibility tests for the credit. The bill would also prohibit the IRS from “recapturing” the $8,000 credit when service members are forced to sell or rent out their houses because they are ordered to deploy to a different duty station, overseas or inside the country.

Under the regular rules of the program, buyers who obtain the credit must use their houses as a principal residence for 36 months or be required to repay the credit to the IRS. As a result of the 36-month rule, many military and diplomatic employees have been hesitant to buy a house and claim the credit, or are worried that their absence from the country could force them to repay the money.

For example, the spouse of a Foreign Service officer posted to the Philippines this summer for a two-year assignment wrote to Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., to alert him to a flaw in the tax credit program. The Oregon couple bought their first home earlier this year, encouraged by affordable prices and the $8,000 credit. But having now been posted abroad, they cannot claim to occupy the house as their principal residence. Under current rules, they even face recapture of the full credit.
Blumenauer, who is a member of the Ways and Means Committee, said “it is absurd that thousands of Americans serving our country, away from friends and family, must choose between their service work and homeownership.” He wrote corrective legislative language that ultimately was incorporated into Rangel’s tax bill.

Though nothing is guaranteed on Capitol Hill, legislation eliminating tax penalties on the military during wartime looks like a good bet for early passage in both houses. Equally significant: It now appears likely that there will be an $8,000 tax credit available a year from now — at least for some purchasers. Which raises the question: Why not leave it in place for all first-time buyers?

There’s growing support for that on both sides of the Capitol, but there are also some complicating issues. In the Senate, the most outspoken advocate for months has been a Republican, Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia, a former real estate broker. He wants not only to extend the credit to Dec. 1, 2010, but to raise the maximum to $15,000, and make it available to all home buyers next year.

But recently, key Senate Democrats produced their own version of an extension, limited to six months, retaining the ceiling at $8,000 and targeting only first-time purchasers. The bill’s primary sponsor is Sen. Benjamin Cardin, D-Md. Democratic co-sponsors include Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan. Republicans John Ensign of Nevada and Isakson have signed on as well.

In a statement, Cardin raised what may prove to be the crucial issue affecting the scope and duration of any credit extension: Cost. “A six-month extension is a fiscally responsible way to provide adequate time to nudge even more prospective home buyers off the sidelines,” he said.
Estimates of the revenue costs of the current credit vary widely, from $3 billion to $8 billion and up. How do you pay for any extension without worsening the budget deficit? The new Rangel bill includes the answer: You raise taxes somewhere else — you “pay as you go.” The Rangel bill pays for most of the servicemen’s credit extension by increasing IRS penalties on taxpayers who fail to file partnership or “S” corporation returns.

This would raise an estimated $327 million over the next 10 years. Where and how to raise taxes to cover the far larger cost of a six-month or 12-month extension of the current tax credit could prove much more controversial.

Union-Tribune

What To Subscribe To:

Get Our Twitter Updates
Get Our Blog Blast
Connect With Us On Facebook

Chico, CA Interest Rates Market Report – Economic Influences – September 30, 2009

Will The Unemployment Numbers Matter, Friday?

Rates Are Still Low

I’m Down With ADP…Yeah, You Know Me…

Yeah, well I’m NOT so down with American Data Processing (ADP).  ADP is an American payroll company that releases its own unemployment statistics, separate from the government’s statistics.  Sometimes they’re right on…and other times…well let’s just say that other times…they’re just plain rediculous.  So, you have to be careful with the information that they report. 

254,000 Jobs Cut

ADP reported that the private sector of business cut 254,000 jobs.  They only expected that 200,000 jobs would be cut.  So, you’d think that the market would consider that horrible information and interest rates would plunge downwardly.  Part of the problem is the media.  Remember when we were losing 380,000 jobs, or more, a month?  The media’s take on this is that a loss of 254,000 is almost like Christmas!  Well, my take is that there is almost nobody left to lose their job.  So, where’s the good news in that?

The Real Jobs Numbers

So, let’s take a look at where we really are.  The population of the work force of the United States grows, at 1.5 Million people per year.  So, that’s 125 thousand new jobs a month.  So, if we’re losing 254,000 and the work force is growing at 125 thousand…that puts us at 379,000.  That number close to any other number mentioned in this article?  Now think about this…ten percent of that work force is unemployed.  So, fifteen million people are out of work.  But think about the people whose unemployment compensation has run out.  Also, if you don’t physically look for work in a four week period, you’re not included in those numbers, either.  That bring unemployment to more like, eleven percent.  Now, many of the Americans that lost their jobs over the past couple of years, had to settle for part-time jobs.  That’s another six percent.  So, realistically, The United States of America is seventeen percent (17%) unemployed.  UGLY!

What’s Your Point, Danny?

We’ve got a long way to go.  To put it mildly, we would have to have the best employment period, ever on record over a ten year course, to get back to normal six percent (6%) unemployment.  I know, “Danny Doom & Gloom.”  But, don’t let the media tell you that things are golly and rosy out there.  They’re not.  So, this information should keeps low, however, when the government stops buying Mortgage-Backed Securities, rates will move up.  And when inflation moves up, that’s when things could get ugly.  SO BUY NOW!  When I say that employment figures should keep rates down, I’m looking at the 7.0% range, in a couple years. 

Float Like A Butterfly

So, we’ll be ready to “sting like a bee,” with a quick finger on the lock button, but let’s see how the day pans out, before locking.  If you have time

Related Must Reads

Why You Can’t Close A Loan In Six Days, Anymore
Read PAST ADP Mistakes
ADP Getting Better?

What To Subscribe To:

Get Our Twitter Updates
Get Our Blog Blast
Connect With Us On Facebook

90-Day “Flipping Rule” Fannie/Freddie/and FHA

Knowing Who Allows It Could Make You $$$

Understanding the 90 Day "Flipping" Rule

What’s “Flipping?”

Here’s the deal…Different banks have different contracts with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  That’s why Bank of America can’t do some loans that Wells Fargo can.  Period!  One interesting opportunity, that we’re seeing a lot of currently, is buying a property that has been foreclosed on, for an extremely low price, then turning around, fixing it up, and selling it for a significant profit.  Otherwise known as, “flipping,” in the industry.

The 90 Day Rule

Here’s a general rule.  When someone buys a home for a certain price, and tries to immediately sell it for more (immediately, here, means 90 days), banks have rules.  One of those rules is that you may not “flip” the property.  The key word, here, is “banks.”  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac DON’T CARE if you turn and sell the property, immediately.  FHA Does!

Want To Turn An Immediate Profit?

So, what do people do if they’re trying to turn a quick profit?  Well, work with me, of course!  Here’s why!

What’s The Deal?

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s guidelines are clear…you may purchase a home, fix it up, and sell it, promptly.  Even for a profit.  So, why don’t many banks allow a buyer to come in and purchase a “flipper” within the 90 days?  Let’s talk about FHA’s guidelines.

FHA “Flipping” Guidelines

 If you care, read about them, here!

Hey Investor, You Can Still Flip!

So,as I stated above, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have different contracts with different banks.  So, if Fannie Mae doesn’t care if you “flip” a property and Freddie Mac doesn’t care if you “flip” a property, why don’t banks let you?

Many banks interpret FHA’s guidelines as their guidelines, regarding flipping. But some banks’ legal departments understand these guidelines…particularly.  So, guess who knows which banks interpret Fannie/Freddie Guidelines regarding “flipping,” as opposed to FHA’s guidelines regarding “flipping?”  I DO!

So, if your listed home doesn’t meet FHA’s criteria, regarding “flipping,” but does Fannie/Freddie’s criteria…and you want to “flip” that home, immediately, for a profit…call me!  Access has contracts with banks that allow it!

 

What To Subscribe To:

Get Our Twitter Updates
Get Our Blog Blast
Connect With Us On Facebook